Case study

Integrated controller or solar drive:
250 m³/day in Andalusia

In the Guadalquivir valley, a drip-irrigated orchard draws its water from a 120 m borehole and fills a raised pond. Peak demand is 250 m³ a day, there is no power line on the plot and the grower does not want one. LE LAB proposes two solutions at this duty point: a LORENTZ PSk2 controller and a GRUNDFOS SPE permanent-magnet motor on an RSI drive. Here is how LE LAB separates them, and why one drive feature, real as it is, counts for nothing here.

Córdoba · Spain Need: 250 m³/day 120 m borehole Pond raised 5 m 150 m of pipe No backup power
The project

An orchard, a pond, not a power socket

The layout is that of thousands of Andalusian plots: a borehole, a pipe rising to an irrigation pond, and drip lines fed by gravity from the pond. The pump therefore does not have to follow the emitters' demand, it has a single duty, filling the pond within the day. A grid connection is not considered: the substation is far away, and solar at the pace of the sun suits this kind of filling exactly.

250 m³/dpeak demand of the irrigation season, to be filled within the day
120 mwater depth, plus 5 m of lift to the pond and 150 m of pipe
132 mthe total dynamic head computed by LE LAB, friction losses included
No backupneither grid nor generator: the question of an alternating-current input does not arise
Step 1

The input data

Seven answers are enough. The irradiation reference city is Córdoba, water depth 120 m, lift to the pond 5 m, pipe run 150 m. LE LAB computes the total dynamic head on its own, 132 m, adding friction losses to the elevation. The backup power box stays on no, and that answer counts as much as the others.

LE LAB study summary: Córdoba in Spain, 250 m³ per day, depth 120 m, lift 5 m, 150 m of pipe, computed total dynamic head 132 m, no backup power

The summary before calculation. The total dynamic head is computed for you, it is not to be entered.

Step 2

The selected solution: an integrated controller

LE LAB selects a LORENTZ PSk2-40 fitted with the C-SJ42-19 pump end, a 6-inch assembly accepting up to 62 m³/h and 200 m of head. The array counts 76 panels of 515 Wp, that is 39,140 Wp, wired as four parallel strings of nineteen panels in series. Average production settles at 276.4 m³ a day for 250 required.

Solution selected by LE LAB: LORENTZ PSK2-40 C-SJ42-19 pump, 39,140 Wp solar array in 76 panels of 515 Wp, average production 276.4 m³ per day

The solution at a glance: the pump, the array and the average production, with the seasonal range stated without fuss.

What an integrated controller really changes. The PSk2 controller is the pump's power stage: it carries maximum power point tracking, motor protection and fill management, and it is matched to its pump end by the manufacturer. There is therefore no drive to size separately, and no pairing to check between a motor and a cabinet of another reference.
Step 3

The two solutions at the same duty point

LE LAB does not show a single answer. At 250 m³ a day and 132 m of head, it proposes two solutions, one per drive family, ranked by the size of the photovoltaic array they demand.

SolutionPhotovoltaic arrayAverage productionEquipment
LORENTZ PSk2-40 C-SJ42-1939,140 Wp · 76 × 515 Wp276.4 m³/dintegrated PSk2-40 controller
GRUNDFOS SPE 32-1939,200 Wp · 80 × 490 Wp280.0 m³/dRSI 30 kW drive, sine-wave filter, temperature sensor

The two arrays are almost the same size: 39,140 Wp against 39,200 Wp, a gap of 60 Wp, and 76 panels against 80. At this duty point the integrated controller therefore buys no installed power, and the SPE even produces a little more on average, 280.0 m³/d against 276.4. What separates the two solutions lies elsewhere, in the equipment to be fitted. The choice between the two Grundfos motors on a drive is covered on its own page, SP or SPE.

Step 4

Production, month by month

On the real irradiation of the region, production runs from 206.6 m³ a day in December to 347.0 in July. Sizing is done on the average month, and the range is shown as it is: the winter months fall below the 250 m³ required. For an orchard that is the right trade-off, since peak irrigation falls precisely when the sun is there. A grower who needed the 250 m³ in December would read this chart and size on the least favourable month, which the application offers.

Monthly production estimated against the need of 250 m³ per day at Córdoba: from 206.6 m³ per day in December to 347.0 in July, with monthly rainfall

Estimated monthly production, against the line of the need. The blue curve is rainfall, it tells the irrigation season better than a calendar.

The technical point

The RSI alternating-current input, and why it counts for nothing here

The GRUNDFOS RSI solar drive has a feature the PSk2 controller does not have as standard: it accepts alternating current. The photovoltaic array and a three-phase supply connect to the same drive input terminals, through a source changeover that prevents them from being connected at the same time, and the manufacturer presents this supply as a backup in case the solar array is interrupted. It is a real advantage, provided you need it.

An alternating-current input is not hybrid operation. The RSI manual is explicit: the converter must not be supplied at the same time with alternating and direct current, and an interlocking device is recommended. So you work on one source at a time, with a changeover, not on a blend of the two energies. On the LORENTZ side, the PSk2 only takes the grid through a separate converter, the SmartPSUk2, through which the whole solar array then passes; in exchange, that converter blends the two sources continuously instead of switching. Two philosophies, two wiring diagrams, and one common condition: that the customer asks for backup.

On this orchard nobody does. The criterion therefore separates nothing. The ranking goes by array size, and here the two arrays are 60 Wp apart: what really separates them is the equipment, a matched controller on one side, a drive and its sine-wave filter on the other. In a country next door, on a far deeper borehole and with the grid at the substation, the same question gives the opposite answer, and for good reasons.

What this case shows

Two arrays of the same size, two sets of equipment

39,140 Wpthe array selected, against 39,200 Wp for the SPE at the same duty point, that is 76 panels against 80
No separate drivethe PSk2 controller is matched to its pump by the manufacturer: no drive to size alongside
One sourcethe RSI alternating-current input is a changeover, not a blend: the manual forbids simultaneous supply
132 mthe total dynamic head, computed by the application from the borehole, the lift and the pipe
To go further: the coverage matrix gives, for every head and flow pair, the power of the smallest controller in the catalogue; the SP or SPE page details the two Grundfos motors on a drive, and the RSI solar drive page its sizing rules.

Your project deserves the same study

Replay this study with your own figures: location, need, borehole, backup power. Free, no registration, results in a few minutes.